SA's toxic algae bloom: Karenia cristata

The current harmful algae bloom (HAB) in South Australia, a number of species within the Karenia family, some of which produce brevetoxins ((marine neurotoxins) including  Karenia cristata.  This HAB  is the largest and most destructive algal bloom in Australia’s history and it is persisting along parts of the South Australian coastline, a year on from when it was first detected in March 2025. It has affected 20,000 sq km of coast and resulted in marine mass mortality killing millions of sea creatures – from tiny shellfish to top predators like white sharks. It is  the most significant marine mortality events on the great southern reef in living memory. 

Though the  coastal water can be clear along  the beach  it has been stripped of biodiversity and marine life. If you walk along the coastal path between Rosetta Head and  Kings Head you can see the HAB  sitting in the sea just off the coast:

It comes and goes. Looking back we can see that that the initial SA Government response and messaging about the harmful algae bloom  were fragmented and confusing for stakeholders,  and that there were delays in both the Commonwealth and state governments' responses. The concerns of the local community on the southern Fleurieu Peninsula  were not heeded until the bloom reached the Adelaide metropolitan beaches.  

Karenia cristata is  the primary source of brevetoxins and this species produces high levels of neurotoxins -- hence Kalani's death from eating dead fish and the distressed and paralysed western grey kangaroos at Tunkakilla on the southern Fleurieu Peninsula who  were close to the toxic algae bloom. 

 UTS’s Professor Shauna Murray, who who first identified the Karenia cristata  species for  producing brevetoxins in Australian waters in November 2025  observes: “We isolated Karenia cristata cells and grew them in our laboratory and then used a series of molecular genetic methods to  dentify and quantify them in South Australian waters since March 2025. We found K. cristata cells were producing high levels of brevetoxins, which hadn’t been known before.”

What we know from CSIRO is that the Karenia cristata has had regular, albeit low levels of presence in South Australian waters since sampling began in 2016, but that during 2025 there was a massive increase in its abundance. In 2025 something happened in the environment that made it dramatically increase in abundance. It's an open question as to what happened but the main theory is marine warming in the coastal sea waters from climate change, high nutrient levels  and high-pressure weather systems leading to still autumn conditions. 

The bloom still lingers, 12 months on from March 2025   as it has  somehow managed to persist throughout the whole gamut of conditions over the course of a year as the conditions get more suitable for Karenia cristata and similar seasonal conditions to last year. It thrives in relatively cool, temperate coastal waters as it can persist and dominate in colder water conditions and so  thrives in autumn and winter. 

So far scientists/researchers  have not discovered   a bacteria or virus that may infect the micro-algae and control its growth. The Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications Report on the Algae bloom in SA (November 2025) stated that there are currently no viable options to limit the spread of the current harmful alga bloom. 

Update 

Ian Gibbins in his Facebook post about the ABC's 4 Corners programme  says tin relation tooth health advice hat: 

"The information that Prof Spurrier gave in her answers were, not surprisingly, consistent with the advice given out by the Health Department. The critique of this information requires some subtlety. What she said, and what the health advice has said, is mostly true in a strict sense, and is backed up by the scientific literature as far as it goes. But the important point here is that the advice is incomplete, it does not acknowledge the complexities of the situation, both in the water and in the affected communities, and it has been hopelessly slow to adapt to the changing environment and the appearance of new data. And then there has been the spin factor which has tried to iron out any hint of complexity in the real situation. "

The response by the SA  Health Department was slow and haphazard to address both the severity of the bloom’s impacts and the brevetoxins consequences of Karenia cristata. The federal government initially held that the algal bloom was the responsibility of the state and that they only  available in a supporting capacity, even though  numerous scientists stated that the scale and nature of the algal bloom was undoubtedly an issue of national significance that required a coordinated, national response.

6 responses
With no perceptible action to address the anthropogenic causes of this environmental catastrophe, it is a worrying thought that our coastline may endure a recrudescence of Karenia cristata as waters cool towards winter.
Susan, I agree. I wasn't convinced by the Murray River flood hypothesis as that happened two years ago. The cause is complex but the initial key for the Karenia algae bloom in our coastal waters for me was the marine heating that enabled the bloom (which includes the cytotoxins of Karenia mikimotoi and the brevetoxin from Karenia cristata) to grow so fastened taker off. A secondary cause is that the deeper ocean water, rich in nutrients, mixes with surface water coupled tolow rates of flushing because of the recent calm events may have contributed to more retention of nutrients in the marine eco-system. What hasn't happened is that the rougher ocean conditions, storms and currents to dissipate the bloom and bring other ocean water into the gulfs, and cooler water conditions did not result in the end of South Australia's Karenia bloom. A warming world is going to lead to more algal blooms.
I have just read the Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications Report on the Algae bloom in SA (November 2025) and it discounts both the Murray River hypothesis and that of the deep ocean upwelling events. They mentioned a range of land and water management practices ( eg., nutrient runoff) that may have increased the nutrient levels in SA waters and created favourable conditions for the harmful algae bloom (HAB) growth. Climate change was deemed to be the underlying driver of the current HAB
The state senate report was underwhelming to say the least. My go to is the Federal Senate Parliamentary enquiry findings, which amongst other recommendations, said that both federal and state government had abandoned us to this disaster, and that a minimum spend of half a billion would be needed to kickstart recovery, let alone anything that needs to be spent on the causes. With the state enquiry, when the renowned estuarine ecologist Faith Coleman gave evidence under parliamentary privilege, she was subsequently savaged and accused of being a liar etc despite not being a government employee - so no incentive to lie. As a result, she is running for the upper house with Tammy Franks as independents. I hope she gets elected, she would simply be our best asset…(the final box P)
I've just read Faith Colman's submission to the ECR, what she has said publicly and her estuarine research The scientists have been saying these events would happen in the making zone for ages and the politicians ignored them. I can understand Faith Colman being put in the political frame as an adversary. She challenged the government's narrative that it was natural causes rather than human made causes. Natural causes means that it is out of the hands of the state government to do anything about it. It cannot be held responsible. Coleman had argued that the bloom is fundamentally linked to climate change, rather than solely being triggered by previous River Murray flood nutrients, stating she hasn't seen evidence to support the flood theory as the main trigger. She also said that the bloom could last 18 months to two years, warning that if it persists through winter, it will likely return with greater intensity in the summer. Well she is right: there were great streaks of the bloom from Petrel Cove and around West Island and back to Petrel Cove today. Coleman also argued that while upwelling brings some nutrients, it is a regular occurrence; the current disaster was supercharged by extreme water temperatures (2.5°C above average) and potentially localised nutrient loads from things like stormwater, rather than distant river floods. Coleman also argued that the bloom is a symptom of decades of mismanagement and habitat loss (such as seagrass and shellfish reefs) which historically acted as natural filters for the system.
1 visitor upvoted this post.